Viewing entries in
Posthumanism

Technology pushes sporting boundaries (25 March, 2007)

Interview by Australian Associated Press while in Brisbane last week. Here's the outcome:

Technology pushes sporting boundaries

http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411366/1035788

Dozens of leading professional golfers, including Tiger Woods, have had eye surgery to improve their vision. Some believe it gives them "better than perfect" eyesight and makes the tricky business of reading greens far easier.

Hundreds of American major league baseball pitchers have had surgery to implant stronger tendons from elsewhere in their bodies into their elbows. Many of them testify that they can throw the ball harder and faster than they could before the operation.

Now the day may not be far away when athletes have microscopic-sized devices implanted in their brains to help them perform better.

According to Dr Andy Miah, a British bioethicist, the line between using technology to improve sporting equipment and using it to improve the bodies of its practitioners is becoming increasingly blurred.

"Sports are technologically enabled practises," Miah said.

"We are pushing the limits of the body technologically and creatively - and I think the relationship between those two is quite close.

"People are fascinated with what the body can do in various kinds of performances."

Miah, who was in Brisbane this week to address a conference organised by the Australian Sports Commission, said functional elective surgery in sport is a more immediate issue than the
long-feared emergence of genetically manipulated athletes.

While the World Anti-Doping Agency concentrates on performance-enhancing drugs and worries about so called "gene-doping", it has no provision in its code for surgically enhanced athletes.

Woods, who was so short-sighted his doctor said he could barely count fingers held in front of his face, wore contact lenses early in his career.

He had laser surgery on his eyes in late 1999. After the surgery, which gave him vision rated at 20-15, Woods said the hole looked bigger to him.

Whether or not the surgery had anything to do with it, Woods won seven of the next eight PGA tour events he played in. The following year he began the "Tiger Slam" in which he became the first man to hold all four Majors at the same time.

Woods' surgeon, Dr Mark Whitten, says the eyesight produced by surgically altering the shape of the cornea gives golfers an enhanced three-dimensional view of the shot confronting them. "It
may be better than normal vision," he says.

Others who have had the surgery include Retief Goosen, Vijay Singh, Scott Hoch, Jesper Parnevik, Lee Westwood and Mike Weir.

Around 10% of major league baseball pitchers in the US have had surgery to strengthen their elbows, which come under enormous strain from repeatedly hurling baseballs at 150 kilometres an hour.

The procedure, called ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCR), is widely know as Tommy John surgery after the pitcher who first had it done in 1974.

According to a report published in USA Today, it involves taking a tendon, usually from the wrist or leg, and grafting it into the elbow in a figure-of-eight pattern through tunnels drilled in the
humerus and ulna bones.

The surgery has saved the careers of hundreds of pitchers, and there is evidence that its success rate is encouraging younger pitchers with only minor elbow injuries to seek the surgery to help their careers.

Some pitchers say they come back better than ever.

"I hit my top speed (in pitch velocity) after the surgery," said Kerry Wood, who had the procedure five years ago and now pitches for the Chicago Cubs. "I'm throwing harder, consistently."

Miah believes there is now a new frontier in sporting technology, driven by the convergence of nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science.

All of these have profound implications for technological and medical developments generally, as well as within sport.

"It seems likely to me that sports will confront the implications of this convergence quite soon.

"We can imagine nanotechnological devices being utilised by athletes to keep them fit ... these are molecular-sized devices that could be inserted into the brain to elicit certain kinds of
physiological modifications."

The technique has already been used to implant molecular-sized devices into the brains of people suffering from Parkinson's disease.

The implants alter the brain's electrical output to help cure the  uncontrollable shaking that is the main symptom of the disease.

Technology such as this could have implications in shooting, snooker, archery and other disciplines requiring steady aim.

Miah, who believes genetic manipulation of athletes is not necessarily a bad thing, says the march of technology is throwing up some crucial philosophical questions.

"The development of biotechnology, stem cell research, cloning technology and the like has provoked a kind of moral encounter with what it means to be human and what technology might be doing to alter that.

"If we can develop devices that make it difficult to say these are external to the body, if they're implantable into the body then it becomes much harder to say that they are artificial."

Our Sporting Future (21-23 March, 2007)

Next month, I jet across to Brisbane to give a keynote by the title:  New Media Futures: The Challenge from Posthumanity.

The emerging technologies of new media are changing the way people work, enjoy leisure and communicate. This paper will explore the challenge raised from the convergence of technology platforms and scope the scene for what lies ahead for sports involvement. The paper identifies two crucial trends in development, the process towards ‘immersion’ (bringing audiences closer to the arena) and ‘abstraction’ (bringing athletes closer to simulated arenas) and discusses the collapse of bodies and technology as distinct categories, which raises prospects of the posthuman performer in competition. The discussion considers what tomorrow’s people will expect from the mediatisation of sports and explores some of the implications this has for the organisation of society and the role of technology within it. While dominant cultural narratives portray such futures as inhuman or dehuman, I argue that these transformations offer rich variation to contemporary life by appealing to imaginative ways of communication and embodiment.

I will also take part in a debate about the role of science in the contribution of winning medals.  It looks to be an exciting event and it's nearly 7 years since I've been to Australia. I just wish I was there for longer!

Somatechnics: Bodily (Trans)formations (19-21 Apr, 2007)

CFP DEADLINE: January 5th 2007 Somatechnics: Bodily (Trans)formations Conference 2007

April 19th-21st 2007 Carlton Crest Hotel Sydney Australia

'Somatechnics' is a newly coined term used to highlight the inextricability and mutually co-constitutive nature of bodies and 'technologies' (in the broadest sense of the term), of soma and techne. This term, then, supplants the logic of the 'and', indicating that technes are not something we add to or apply to the body, but rather, are the means in and through which bodies are constituted, positioned, and lived. As such, the term reflects contemporary understandings of the body as the incarnation or materialization of historically and culturally specific discourses and practices, and of activities involving bodies - in medicine, information technology, education, the arts, surveillance, science, law - as fundamentally formative and transformative, cultural and social.

Abstracts (approx 500 words) are invited for papers/performances/panels for the Somatechnics Conference, hosted by the Department of Critical and Cultural Studies, Macquarie University, to be held in Sydney, Australia on April 19th-21st 2007.

This is the third in a series of bi-annual conferences: previous conferences were Body Modification: Changing Bodies, Changing Selves(2003), and Body Modification Mark II (2005) (see: www.ccs.mq.edu.au/bodmod ).

Possible topics include:

Technologies of gender/race/class/etc Body modification/sculpting Medical technologies Enhancement technologies Transgender practices and procedures genital surgeries Cosmetic/reconstructive surgeries Obesity, anorexia, and/or other body 'pathologies' Cyborgs Nanotechnology Euthanasia ageing Reproductive technologies Transplant technologies BIID and other 'pathologies' reproduction population control Disability Incarceration Racialization Torture Terrorism 'harm' War Sport Performance art Visual art Religious rituals Multi-media technologies Sense culture

Abstracts (of no more than 500 words) should be sent, as email attachments, to: nikki.sullivan [at] scmp.mq.edu.au AND smurray [at] unwired.com.au no later that 5th January 2007.

Further information

Nikki Sullivan Department of Critical and Cultural Studies Macquarie University North Ryde New South Wales 2109 Australia

Conference Website: http://www.somatechnics.org/conference

Contact Email: nikki.sullivan [AT] scmp.mq.edu.au

Free Thinking: A Festival of ideas for the future

 

This morning, Beatriz and I strolled down to the BBC Radio3 Free Thinking festival taking place at FACT. Two of our friends - Jude Kelly and Nick Bostrom - were presenting at the same time though in different rooms, so we split up and re-grouped afterwards, taking in lunch with the 'robotic' panel afterwards. This also included Fiona Coyle from CeSAGen at Cardiff Uni and it was good to meet her as I know some of her colleagues quite well. She also injected some much-needed critical theory into the posthuman debate. Dylan Evans was articulating the 'hang on a second' perspective and told me about his very interesting 'utopia experiment' project in Scotland, where he has just moved. It was a good chance to see FACT at full-speed and the debate I saw was well-attended, especially for a Sunday morning! Artist Neil Harbisson was present with inventor of his Eyeborg Adam Montandon. Coincidentally, I had seen Neil before at the Bankside Gallery in London, where he was performing at the Sense and Sensuality exhibition.

Eyeborg

Aimee Mullins, some meaningful connections (for me)

1. I'm currently reviewing 'The Prosthetic Impulse'edited by Marquard Smith and Joanne Morra for the journal Body and Society, within which 2 chapters discuss Aimee Mullins.

2. I saw Cremaster 3 a couple of years ago at the CCA in Glasgow, within which Aimee Mullins features in various roles.

3. I visited the Cremaster exhibition at the Guggenheim New York in 2002 and another in the Chelsea area of NYC this May.

4. 2 newspapers this week have included features about Aimee, one was the Times on Sunday, another is today, also the Times, which includes a feature on Nick Knight, who shot the iconic photograph of Aimee with her 'cheetah legs'.

5. A friend of mine from secondary school went to work with Nick Knight a few years ago. His name is Ben Dunbar-Brunton. I was down in London a couple of weeks ago for a workshop hosted at the Science Museum which aimed to plan an exhibition on the future of sport. At this meeting was Ross Philips who works within one of Knight's online spaces.

6. Cheetah Man is the name of the image depicted on the cover of my book 'Genetically Modified Athletes'. Both of these images - in their different ways and in the context of Smith and Mora's book raise questions about the meaning of prosthesis in contemporary life and its relationship to technofetishism and disability studies.

7. Aimee Mullins is also a medal winning Paralympian.

8. I have just published an article that discusses notions of 'ability' against 'disability studies' in the context of tests for performance genes.

9. I spoke about Aimee Mullins' 'cheetah legs' at a lecture I gave to the Royal College of Art 'Design Interactions' programme a couple of weeks ago.

Royal College of Art (October, 2006)

Last week, I went down to the RCA to give a talk I titled 'Posthuman Designs'. The programme on Design Interactions led by Anthony Dunne is just fascinating, engaging students with ways of imagining the future as a mechanism through which to promote public engagement about technology. Some of the work taking place there is superb and with everyone squeezed into a seminar room earnestly taking notes and thinking about how to transform concepts into artefacts, it's a really inspiring place. I hope to be down there again soon.

International Conference on Sport Technology and Development (Shah Alam, Malyasia, Sept 2006)

Andy Miah in Shah AlamThis was a wonderful meeting where I had a chance to taste a little of the Malaysian lifestyle. It was a bit of a flying visit, but thoroughly worthwhile. The conference was the first major conference of this department, which is very well positioned withiin the university (of over 100,000 students!).

Conference website available online. My paper was titled Posthuman Sport

Bioteknica Laboratory Remix

In 2003, I was on a panel with Jennifer and Shawn at the Glasgow School of Art.... BIOTEKNICA LABORATORY REMIX: with Teratological Prototypes in Collaboration with Tissue Culture & Art Project Shawn Bailey | Jennifer Willet | Oron Catts | Ionat Zurr

Aug 7 – 13 2006 ZeroOne San Jose: A Global Festival of Art on the Edge & the Thirteenth International Symposium of Electronic Art (ISEA2006)

http://www.bioteknica.org <http://www.bioteknica.org> http://www.tca.uwa.edu.au/ <http://www.tca.uwa.edu.au/> http://www.01sj.org/

BIOTEKNICA LABORATORY REMIX (with Teratological Prototypes in collaboration with TC&A) is a complex functional laboratory installation – built to sustain cellular life within the gallery environment.  Utilizing tissue culture and tissue engineering technologies, we have developed a series of small sculptures (Teratological Prototypes) that will be grown live in the gallery environment with an accompanying installation, laboratory protocol performances, and video. This work mobilizes the notion of remixing the laboratory environment as a critical turn in creating an interface between non-specialists - and ‘real’ and mediated representations of the laboratory.

Through a critical participatory methodology BIOTEKNICA LABORATORY REMIX both embraces and critiques evolving biotechnologies, considering the contradictions and deep underlying complexities that these technologies offer the present and future of humanity.

We wish to thank our supporters: SymbioticA, School of Anatomy and Human Biology at The University of Western Australia, The Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, HEXAGRAM, Conseil des arts et des lettres du Québec, Programme Québec Multimédia Jeunesse, The Canada Council for The Arts, Concordia Part-Time Faculty Union, The Banff Centre for the Arts, and Articule Artist Run Centre.

For more information please contact Jennifer Willet:  jwillet@sympatico.ca

Kristi Giselsson

Well this is a little experiment. I met Kristi in Stanford during the Human Rights and Human Enhancement conference. She explained a little of her phd to me, which was interested in posthumanism. At the time, I recalled a paper from an author in Aus who I thought might interest her. Now, upon looking through my endnote file, I discover the article again and think of sending it. However, I cannot find her email address online anywhere, so I thought I'd post to wordpress with her name in the expectation that she will, at some point Google herself and find it. What name could we give this kind of activity? It's a form of inverse emailing. Anyway, Kristi, if you see this, here is the article and get in touch!

Bendle, M. F. (2002). "Teleportation, Cyborgs and the Posthuman Ideology." Social Semiotics 12(1): 45-62.

TransVision06

TransVision06 August 17-19, 2006

University of Helsinki, Finland, Europe

http://www.transhumanismi.org/tv06/

The annual TransVision conference brings together leading transhumanist thinkers, technologists, scientists and philosophers from around the world.

This year's conference is held under the theme "Emerging Technologies ofHuman Enhancement".

The conference will be held in Helsinki, Finland, one ofthe world's leading high technology centers. TransVision06 is organized bythe World Transhumanist Association together with the Finnish Transhumanist Association.**

Keynote speakers     * Dr. William Sims Bainbridge  National Science Foundation (USA)     * Dr. Aubrey de Grey           University of Cambridge; IEET

** Other prominent speakers:

  • Prof. Timo Airaksinen        University of Helsinki
  • Dr. Nick Bostrom             Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford; WTA; IEET 
  • Jose Cordeiro                Millennium Project
  • Dr. Ben Goertzel             Noveamente LLC 
  • Dr. James Hughes             WTA; IEET
  • Prof. Hannu Kari             Helsinki University of Technology
  • Giulio Prisco                FutureTAG; WTA; IEET
  • Dr. Richard Sherlock         Utah State University
  • Philippe Van Nedervelde      Foresight Nanotech Institute
  • Natasha Vita-More            Extropy Institute
  • David Wood                   Symbian Inc.

Full list of speakers is available at the conference website.             Early registration open until May 31st!

More information and registration at: http://www.transhumanismi.org/tv06/

Mediated Bodies (14-16 Sept, 2006)

Mediated Bodies International conference 14. 15 and 16 September 2006 Faculty of Arts and Culture Maastricht University The Netherlands

CALL FOR PAPERS

There is no object of scientific investigation that is as difficult to consider a mere object as the human body. People do not merely have but are their bodies. Accordingly, there is a strong mutual relationship between scientific, esp. medical conceptions and practices and the constitution and experience of the body in other cultural domains (i.e. religion, philosophy, are, popular culture etc.) and in every day life The visualisation of the body's interior is particularly significant as it renders available what is both very nearby and inaccessible in daily experience.

The way the body is dealt with, cared for, used, or sensed changes with how its interiority and boundaries are conceived of and vice-versa. Therefore, the early modern body might be very different from that of the 21st century and the body in African medical practice might bear little resemblance to the corporeal object of European or American biomedicine.

Bodily realities and experiences are produced as much as they are discovered and expressed in the interplay of mediating discourses and practice. Medical visualisation technologies are at the heart of this interplay.The conference centers around the question of how (medical and / or technological) visualisations of the body interact with other discourses and practices in the mediation of human bodies.

This question is explored in 7 successive sessions, each dealing with specific visualisations of bodies and with particular historical or cultural contexts. For each of these sessions there is still place for several papers of 20 minutes.

If you are interested please send an abstract of your contribution to Ren E van de Vall, r.vandevall@lk.unimaas.nl, before 15 May 2006.

World Pro-Doping Agency

I happen to think that I have a relatively moderate view about performance enhancement in sport. My initial position is that the doping dilemma is a genuine ethical issue - one which lends itself to no clear resolution, because there are essentially contested concepts at stake. To this extent, I sympathise with many people involved within the anti-doping movement. I listen to their views, I take on board what they say. To this extent, I also do not shout too loud about the value of a pro-doping stance, even though I am characterised predominantly as advocating this view. For one thing, the doping issue is deeply political and, if one aims to do good philosophy, then taking this into account is critical. Debates surrounding any technological, regulatory issue must engage with the practical ethical problems they present. However, at times, I wonder whether I should be more radical and unforgiving about the case to be made on behalf of doping.

Yet another 'pro-doping' op ed piece passed across my desk today and it has provoked me to consider whether there should be some form of organisation of these disparate views. Perhaps we need to get all the 'pro-doping' views/people together to bring about some form of structured intervention. However, if I do this, I worry that this might compromise my integity by clearly aligning myself with one particular kind of conclusion when, as I say, this issue is more complex.

So, my proposal is to establish a World Pro-Doping Agency as a thought experiment. I wonder how many people would sign up. My first task will be to assemble all papers, people and institutions that have raised questions about the anti-doping movement. However, the end goal is one that seeks to present constructive proposals to the difficult problem of doping in sport. (Watch out for publications of mine using this title.)

Fashions of the Future

Forbes magazine reports on the future of clothing technology. Examples include a spray-on dress and an outfit that makes you feel as if you are being hugged. This is great fodder for the technophobes who worry that this will replace human contact. For me, these ideas are wonderfully creative, but also the mixing of clothing, design and technology allows us to consider how we might view the latter when it is a, ahem, seamless part of our bodies. As they mention, clothing is already technologically sophisticated, but this show indicates the many possibilities that are just around the corner.

Enhance Project

The website of the ENHANCE project launched earlier this month. It is a vast collaborative network covering all aspects of enhancement technologies, funded through the European 6th Framework programme. Watch that space!

Technosexual - Extreme Makeover Needed!

James Hughes just told me about a new page written by Justice De Thezier on the emerging technosexual, the made-over transhuman. He told me this, as the page has a photo of me at the end of it! So, this makes me the first technosexual, doesnt it?Should I be pleased about that? If someone wikis this, please ensure my photo is included. Somebody should probably get some posters printed. [I have just seen that there is already a wikipedia entry!]

Vital Politics II - Health, Medicine, and Bioeconomics into the 21st Century (1 March, 2006)

The BIOS Centre is organizing an international conference on 7-9 September 2006 at the London School of Economics and Political Science. The aims of the conference are to provide a comparative and global perspective on present forms of practice in the life sciences. The Organizing Committee welcomes proposals for individual papers which seek to make conceptually innovative contributions to the exploration of the character and genealogy of transformations in health, illness, vitality, and pathology. We are particularly (though not exclusively) seeking abstracts which relate to following themes:

Social science of regenerative medical technologies Papers which explore any area related to the science(s), technologies, regulation, implications and use of regenerative medical technologies such as stems cells, cell cultures, engineered tissues, or xenotransplantation. We welcome papers which explore the social and ethical implications of regenerative medical technologies as they relate to ideas and notions around identity, gender, disability, age, ethnicity, or social class. Papers that explore regenerative medical technologies in relation to concepts such as embodiment, personhood, responsibility, risk and capitalism are also welcomed.

Neuroscience and society Papers which explore any area related to the manufacture, governance and implications of new technologies in the neurosciences, such as recent developments surrounding behavioural genomics, psychopharmacology, neuroimaging, consciousness, and the political economy of neuroscience research. In particular, papers which engage with the question of how developments in the neurosciences may be reshaping distinctions between health and illness, treatment and enhancement, normality and pathology.

Bioeconomics and biocapital Papers which explore any area related to the regional, national and transnational economic and political implications of developments in genomics and biomedicine, including issues of biological surveillance; trade; the inequitable distribution of wealth and resources; the patenting of genes and living organisms; branding in biomedicine and biotechnology; and the political economy of intellectual property regimes. Papers which embrace terms such as “biocapital” and “bioeconomics” as effective conceptual heuristics to characterize new economic developments, or which critique the usefulness or the novelty of such terms, are equally welcome.

Please submit abstracts (250-300 words) by email to l.j.mcgoey [at] lse.ac.uk

Deadline for abstract submissions: 01 March 2006

Letters of acceptance will be sent by May 1. The conference fee will be £175 (this fee includes registration, lunches, and a conference dinner. It excludes travel and accommodation).

For any further details, please contact the BIOS Organizing Committee (Chaired by Dr. Carlos Novas) via Linsey McGoey: BIOS, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE

Email: l.j.mcgoey [at] lse.ac.uk Web: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/BIOS/vital_politicsII.htm

Extreme Culture/ Extreme Bodies (Feb 15, 2006)

Call for Abstracts, Chapters, and Proposals ? Deadline Extended to February 15, 2006 Since the 1990s, 'extreme' has become part of the mainstream cultural vocabulary. The American public eagerly consumes extreme cuisine, wears extreme deodorant ('energy-scented'), watches extreme television shows like Fear Factor, drives oversized extreme vehicles, practices extreme sports and signs up for extreme adventure vacations involving bungee jumping, 'high falls,' and 'fire burns.' Extreme body modification, both normative (as exemplified on the television shows Extreme Makeover and The Swan) and non-normative, has been subsumed into the mainstream media, as a form of entertainment and a marketing scheme. These carefully conceived mediated products effectively push boundaries, challenging our conceptions of beauty, deviancy, human pain thresholds, humiliation, entertainment, and leisure. Within this context, it appears that people who want to stand out have been driven to push the extreme to the extreme. Although the roots of extreme culture are counter-cultural, does the extreme body offer a way to resist the standardized, homogeneous, pre-packaged fakeness of consumer society?

The editors of Extreme Culture/Extreme Bodies seek papers on all themes exploring the body, identity, and consumption within the context of extreme culture. Both theoretical and empirical studies are invited from sociological, cultural studies, media studies, and feminist perspectives. Suggested submission topics include, but are not limited to the following themes:

  • The body and consumer culture
  • Recent trends in cosmetic surgery
  • The body within the context of extreme sports
  • Non-normative or subcultural body modification practices
  • The body as an artistic medium
  • Expressions of the extreme body in advertising and popular media
  • Embodiment within cyberspace
  • Theoretical perspectives on postmodernity, identity, and the body

DEADLINE: February 15, 2006. Chapters must be submitted in Microsoft Word format, 12 point font, double spaced. Essays should be in the range of 7500 - 10,000 words with references in ASA style. We will also consider abstracts and shorter proposals. Include a cv with your submission.

Send submissions and inquires to mary.kosut@purchase.edu

Mary Kosut, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Sociology and Media, Society, and the Arts School of Natural and Social Sciences Purchase College - SUNY Purchase, NY 10577

Elizabeth C. Bachner, Ph.D. Instructor of Sociology The New School New York, New York