Beijing Blues

Beijing 4th Olympic Cultural Festival Closing Ceremony

Originally uploaded by andymiah.

Wow, a whole month without posting; I was beginning to develop withdrawal systems. So, I went from Lausanne direct to Beijing and China doesn't allow access to some blogging tools, including wordpress and blogspot. It reminded me how important it is to ftp my blog, but I still haven't worked out how to make that step.

There are too many stories to tell about Beijing, I don't really know where to begin. My flickr stream is packed with new content and still more to come, including inside views of the Bird's nest Olympic stadium.

This photograph is from the Beijing 4th Olympic Cultural Festival Closing Ceremony. More about that and other findings later.

Beijing 2008 Olympic Games

This month, Beatriz and I are in Beijing undertaking research for the British Academy with a view to advising the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games on aspects of media and culture. This is our first visit to China and after one week into the trip everything has been superb.

European College of Sport Science (5-8 July, 2006)

This week, I will be giving an invited paper at the ECSS Annual meeting. This is really a special meeting for me as I see a lot of friends from a range of areas. It's also big, but not too big and this year takes me back to Lausanne again. I spent two months in Lausanne during the Spring of 2001 and it'll be great to be there once more. The presentation is within a session on Medical Ethics and Sports Medicine and I will speak to the following title: 'Steroids Aren't Cool': Criminalising Enhancement and the Politics of Healthcare Ethics. It should be a fun session.

IPac

Kris just emailed to tell me that a photograph he took of me has been included in IPac's 'Senate iPod Content' This seems pretty cool, but I have nearly no context on this one, so just curious to know more about how it was chosen and what it is for! PS: Anyone looking at Kris' photostream will know that I am not really the most interesting one of his catalogue, hence the intrigue to know more.

BioSocieties: an interdisciplinary journal for social studies of life sciences

This is one I missed, looks good! BioSocieties: an interdisciplinary journal for social studies of life sciences

published its second issue in June 2006!   View the home page, contents and abstracts:

Contents of Volume 1, Issue 2 include:

·         Alain Pottage: Too Much Ownership: Bio-prospecting in the Age of Synthetic Biology ·         Nicolas Langlitz: Ceci n’est pas une psychose. Toward a Historical Epistemology of Model Psychoses ·         Anne Harrington: The Many Meanings of the Placebo Effect: Where They Came From, Why They Matter ·         Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose:  Biopower Today ·         Stefan Beck and Jörg Niewöhner: Somatographic Investigations Across Levels of Complexity ·         Stephanie Lloyd: The Clinical Clash over Social Phobia: The Americanization of French Experiences? ·         Michael Barr: ‘I’m not Really Read up on Genetics’: Biobanks and the Social Context of Informed Consent ·         Nathan Greenslit: Books Forum - Reviews of Francis Fukuyama’s Our posthuman future by David B. Resnik, Sheila Jasanoff and Jack Price

You can access free full text from Volume I, Issue 1 at this address, including papers by Sydney Brenner, Ian Hacking, Barbara Prainsack and Gil Siegal, Arthur W. Frank, Cathy Gere and Bronwyn Parry, Catherine Waldby, Sarah Franklin, Marli Huijer, Steven Hyman, Danielle C. Turner and Barbara J. Sahakian, and Elizabeth Wilson.

You can subscribe by following a link from this site, and remember individual subscriptions are only £25.00 or $45.00, with reduced rates for students.

If your institution on does not already subscribe to BioSocieties, you can recommend the journal to your librarian quickly and easily using this online form: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/recommend_BIO <http://www.journals.cambridge.org/recommend_BIO>

You can also sign up to receive email alerts from Cambridge Journals Online which will keep you up-to-date with the latest announcements in the subject areas of your choice.  Simply follow this link to sign up for free table of content alerts.

IEET meeting in Second Life

IEET meeting in Second Life

Originally uploaded by andymiah.

Well, after days of planning, I just caught the tail end of the first IEET seminar in Second Life. Just in time to take a couple of shots, while I was there. I'm pretty new to this environment and discovering new aspects of geekdom, which are pretty interesting. New research themes are 'built' very quickly.

Tom Shakespeare

I met Tom Shakespeare a week or so back in Newcastle. I have known of Tom's work for a number of years now and have cited a few things he has written. He does a great job of engaging people in ethical debate across sectors - arts, politics, philosophy, science - and he just told me about an event where he will speak next month. It is the Darwin Summer Symposium for 2006 entitled 'Unnatural Selection'. Other speakers include Lee Silver (Princeton), author of Remaking Eden...whom I also met this year at the Tomorrow's People conference in Oxford.

Global Communication of Fundamentalist Knowledge

NTNU Globalization Programme and The Norwegian Air Force AcademyInvitation and Call for Papers to the Conference:

Global Communication of Fundamentalist Knowledge

The Norwegian University of Science and Technology December 14–16 2006, Trondheim, Norway

Conference website: <www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu>

Fundamentalism and globalisation are two widely contested concepts. While some analysts claim that both terms refer to increasingly powerful political forces, others argue that neither refers to anything empirically real. This conference seeks to address the following questions: What distinguishes modern fundamentalism from other forms of religious revivalism and political activism? How do global media communicate “fundamentalist knowledge”? Participants are invited to address these wider questions within the three thematic areas outlined below: 1. Community, people and state Since religious communities are constituted in contexts of peoples, states and territories, their aims and ambitions are necessarily worked out in relation to these entities. What is specific to fundamentalism in its relation to these entities? We solicit proposals addressing this question in relation to the following issues: * Concepts of power, religion and law in formations of communities and states. * Concepts of power, religion and law in territorial disputes and international relations. 2. Fundamentalism and exegesis The fundamentalist principle of “return to scripture” is usually associated with literal readings, but it also means bypassing literal readings in order to acquire scripture’s hidden (esoteric) knowledge and to empower “true believers” in relation to their “others”. Proposals are solicited which analyse fundamentalist hermeneutics in relation to the following themes: * Principles of epistemic and communal authority in exegesis. * Esotericism, aestheticism and linguistics in exegesis. * Exegeses and changes in communities, societies, states, and international relations.

3. Media and fundamentalist knowledge Through global media, individuals can avail themselves of a wide range of sources, including religious websites and scriptures. Is this development changing the way religion serves ethnic and national interests? Or is it challenging ethnic and national interests and creating new forms of religious and political activism? Proposals are solicited which seek to define fundamentalism from the following perspectives: * The ways in which religious actors (whether states or trans-national networks) use global media to serve ethnic and national interests. * The ways in which non-religious actors (whether states or trans-national networks) use global media to defend ethnic and national interests against religion

Keynote Speakers

Robert A. Pape, Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago. Professor Pape is author of Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (2005); "Soft Balancing against the United States," International Security (2005); "Explaining Costly International Moral Action" (with Chaim Kaufmann), International Organization (1999); Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (1996). David S. Katz, Professor of History, Tel-Aviv University. Professor Katz is founder of the Global Security Group and author of The Occult Tradition from the European Renaissance to American Fundamentalism (2005), God’s Last Words: Reading the English Bible from the Reformation to Fundamentalism (2004) and Messianic Revolution: Radical Religious Politics to the End of the Second Millennium (1999) Stewart M. Hoover, Professor of Journalism and Adjunct Professor of Religious Studies, University of Colorado at Boulder. Professor Hoover is author of The Electronic Giant (1979), Mass Media Religion: The Social Sources of the Electronic Church (1988) and Religion in the News: Faith and Journalism in American Public Discourse (1998), and is co-editor of Religious Television: Controversies and Conclusions (1990) and Rethinking Media, Religion, and Culture (1997).

Deadlines

September 15, 2006: Deadline for abstracts (300-400 words). Abstract proposals should include a provisional title, full name of author(s), institutional affiliation, correspondence details and should be sent to global@hf.ntnu.no <mailto:global@hf.ntnu.no> Paper presentations must not exceed 20 minutes.

September 30, 2006: Replies to proposals

November 20, 2006: Deadline for registration for all participants (with and without papers) to global@hf.ntnu.no <mailto:global@hf.ntnu.no> Please use the registration form on the conference website <www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu>.

Practical information

There is no conference fee.

The conference will cover the cost of coffees and lunches but participants are expected to cover the costs of all other meals. Dinner reservations will be organized by the conference committee.

Conference hotels: Quality Hotel Augustin, Kongensgt 26, NO-7011 Trondheim Tel.:(+47) 73547000, Fax: (+47) 73547001, nok 800 (single) 900 (double) hotel-augustin@hotel-augustin.no <mailto:hotel-augustin@hotel-augustin.no> www.hotel-augustin.no P-hotels, Nordregate 24, NO-7010 Trondheim, Tlf.:(+47) 73 80 23 50 Fax  (+47)  73 80 23 51, nok 585 (single) 700 (double) post@p-hotels.no <mailto:post@p-hotels.no> Accomodation should be booked and paid for by participants. Special rates for this conference have been agreed with the two hotels above, where participants are encouraged to stay.

Venues

The conference will be held at the following locations:

Thursday 14th December: The Norwegian Air Force Academy, Persaunetveien 61. Bus number 20 from Dronningens gate.

Friday 15th and Saturday 16th December: NTNU, Dragvoll Campus. Bus numbers 5, 9 and 66 depart from Trondheim city centre (Munkegate Street) to Dragvoll every 15 minutes

Contact

Website: www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu <http://www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu> Postal Address: NTNU Globalization Programme NTNU Dragvoll, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway

E-mail: global@hf.ntnu.no <mailto:global@hf.ntnu.no>

Trondheim Sites

About NTNU: http://www.ntnu.no/indexe.php <http://www.ntnu.no/indexe.php>

About Trondheim: http://www.trondheim.com/engelsk/ <http://www.trondheim.com/engelsk/> http://www.trondheim.no/content.ap?thisId=1117612882 <http://www.trondheim.no/content.ap?thisId=1117612882> Global Communication of Fundamentalist Knowledge

The Norwegian University of Science and Technology December 14–16 2006, Trondheim, Norway

Preliminary program - may be reviewed on the conference website, <www.hf.ntnu.no/cofu>

BBC Radio 4

Last week, I gave an interview for Radio 4 on the ethical issues related to developments in golf technology. Below are the details:

The Sports Programme

Mondays, 23:00 - 23:30

Listen to the latest programme

John Wilson

John Wilson

John Wilson brings you the best of the sports stories

The  programme was on:

When does technology cross the line between making sport a better spectacle and undermining the nature of the game? Tim Yeo MP and philosopher Andy Miah discuss speedy golf balls and other gizmos.

Archive

View information on all The Sports Programme programmes

Ethical Aspects of Risk (14-16 June, 2006)

Ethical Aspects of Risk, 14-16 June 2006 Philosophy Department, Delft University of Technology REGISTRATION IS STILL POSSIBLE!

http://www.ethicsrisk.tbm.tudelft.nl/registration.asp

Keynote speakers:

Ruth Chadwick University of Lancaster

Carl Cranor University of California Riverside

Douglas MacLean University of North Carolina

Paul Slovic Decision Research, Oregon

Technology has advanced human well being in a myriad of respects, such as energy, communication and abilities to travel. Still, every technology also has negative side-effects, such as risks from accidents and pollution. A standard way to judge the acceptability of a specific technology is cost-benefit analysis. However, next to the balance between the benefits and risks of a technology the following considerations seem to be important: the distribution of costs and benefits, whether a risk is voluntarily taken, whether there are available alternatives etc. How to judge whether a risk is acceptable is a pressing ethical question that deserves thorough investigation. There is a vast amount of sociological and psychological research on acceptable risks, but surprisingly, there is only very little research from moral philosophy on risks. This conference aims to fill this gap by bringing together moral philosophers, sociologists, psychologists and engineers to reflect on the ethical issues concerning 'acceptable risk'.

The following questions will be the focus of the conference:

  • What are morally legitimate considerations in judging the acceptability of risks? Is cost-benefit analysis the best way or do we need additional considerations?
  • What role should emotions play in judging the acceptability of risks? Are they irrational and distorting or are they a necessary precondition for practically rational judgments?
  • What role should the public play in judging the acceptability of risks (e.g. informed consent procedures analogous to medical ethics)?
  • Is the precautionary principle a fruitful tool in dealing with risks?

Visit the conference website at http://www.ethicsrisk.tbm.tudelft.nl/

For inquiries, contact the organization committee through ethicsrisk@tbm.tudelft.nl

Organization:

Sabine Roeser and Lotte Asveld;

conference management: Henneke Piekhaar ----- 2628 BX Delft The Netherlands T: +31-15-2788779 F: +31-15-2786233 E: S.Roeser@tudelft.nl

http://www.tbm.tudelft.nl/webstaf/sabiner/

Human Enhancement Technologies in Sport

Westminster Palace

Originally uploaded by andymiah.

Today (ok, last week - 21 June), I attended the first session of the government inquiry into HETs in Sports. It was the first time I had visited Westminster Palace and what more suitable occasion could there have been? I have been in touch with the Committee’s secretariat these last few months, chipping in with my suggestions about possible areas of inquiry. I arrived to the Palace around 845am, after an early morning down from Liverpool. Eventually finding Committee Room 6, it was nice to see some familiar faces. The Committee had kindly reserved seats for myself and Nick Bostrom offering us an opportunity to offer some pointed observations. Typically, the celebrity speaker – Linford Christie – arrived fashionably late and it was a personal pleasure to have heard him speak on this topic. I don’t have many childhood heroes and I was hardly a child when Linford was at his peak, but he remains one of my significant others in the sports world and I still have strong memories of him lining up for the beginning of a 100m race and even his running style. He was characteristically entertaining and upbeat about the issues and I took great care to notice his reactions to the various points of debate. It struck me that this man of such great sporting achievement remains a young athlete who was passionate about something he could do very well. In some ways, athletes are the Peter Pans of our modern day, defying the ageing process and defying human limits in the process.

The debate itself was most certainly engaging and a great starting point. Julian stepped up an offered a ‘let them take drugs’ position, while some of the audience members either cringed at the thought or were frustrated at being back to the position they were in 40, 20, 8 or 5 years ago, depending what landmark you use. However, I think this Committee is ready to ask difficult questions about the legitimacy of current doping regulations and Julian's position was certainly not shouted down. In fact, I think many people in this world of sport see the current regulations as a moral crusade, which is shielding the fact that this is an unworkable situation.

I have some concerns that the points of debate will be reduced primarily to doping discussions, when I believe the form of this Inquiry should be broader. There are a number of technologies that have not yet been discussed and we need to consider those too.

Well, I don’t want to get into my specific responses here. These will be submitted to the Committee in due course. I’m just very glad that this is happening. When I met Dr Ian Gibson MP in my home city of Norwich one afternoon in July after the publication of Genetically Modified Athletes, this was the very kind of inquiry we were discussing. Unlikely though it is that our conversation led to this initiative, I’ll happily tell the story that way! (thank you very much!). After all, as Phil Wills, Chair of the Inquiry said at the beginning of this morning, this is the very first time in history that the British government has looked into such a subject. And I would have been just happy to be an ‘also-ran’.

Maurice Agis, Dreamspace

Wandering around Liverpool this weekend, we enountered the Dreamspace, which is located around the back of the Metropolitan Cathedral. At first, you might wonder whether it is worth £5 and you will forget this once you enter!

Lost and Philosophy

Lost and Philosophy Call for Abstracts

Sharon M. Kaye, Editor (skaye@jcu.edu) William Irwin, General Editor (wtirwin@kings.edu) The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series

To propose ideas for future volumes in the Blackwell series please contact William Irwin, <mailto:wtirwin@kings.edu>.

Abstracts and subsequent essays should be philosophically substantial but accessible, written to engage the intelligent lay reader. Contributors of accepted essays will receive an honorarium.

Possible themes and topics might include, but are not limited to, the following:

Is "John Locke" John Locke?; Socrates and Sawyer on egoism; Hurley, Descartes, and Skepticism; Kate, Kant, and the value of good will; Would Aristotle see Jack as a man of virtue?; Prisoners' dilemma strategies among the islanders; Nietzsche, survival, and salvation; Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the noble savage; Jean-Paul Sartre's Other and The Others; Dharma, free will, and fate; Hobbes and the state of nature; The metaphysics of tropical polar bears; The ethics of deception, torture, incest, drug use, and experimentation on human subjects; The Lost women and feminism; Flashback selves: continuity or reinvention?; Foucault, power, and insanity; Aquinas and Rose on faith and reason; Lost numerology; Bootstrapping society: communitarianism vs. liberalism.Contributor guidelines: 1. Abstract of paper (100-500 words).

2. CV or resume for each author and co-author.

3. Submission deadline for abstracts: July 10, 2006

4. Submission deadline for first drafts of accepted papers: October 10, 2006

5. Submission deadline for final papers: February 1, 2007.

6. Submissions should be sent by e-mail, with or without Word attachment to: Sharon Kaye, Associate Professor, John Carroll University (skaye@jcu.edu)

Media, Communications and Cultural Studies Association

After an inspired moment on the train, I thought it'd be great if the MeCCSA newsletter was on their website as an archive and Dave Hesmondhalgh promptly informed me that it is. So, that's another set of documents I don't need to take around the world with me. Access the MeCCSA newsletter page here.

My School's End of Year Showcase

DSC04369.JPG [Picture of final year student Caragh Nugent playing at the Showcase]

Last night was the School of Media, Language and Music end of year Showcase for creative work. It took place at the Tron in Glasgow and was a fantastic evening with a number of live bands - home grown and Swedish! It's so great to see more of the students than I get to see in my classes. They're such a talented bunch and generally quite a cool crowd. What a great way to end the year.

Baudrillard's Cultural Politics

Baudrillard's Cultural Politics A Stream at

Engaging Baudrillard: An International Multidisciplinary Conference 4-6th September 2006 At Swansea University, United Kingdom

Is Jean Baudrillard a prophetic cultural theorist of contemporary political significance? Or is he a myopic intellectual impostor, a twenty-first century writer of cultural and political fantasies that have no relevance to our current condition? How should we understand Baudrillard's explosive cultural and political concepts today?

The aim of this stream is to circumvent both a hasty reaction against and a euphoric celebration of Baudrillard's cultural politics. Rather, it seeks to provide a contemporary assessment of Baudrillard's writings and what they mean for the future of cultural politics. The stream intends to make an important contribution to the broad understanding and literature on Baudrillard's postmodern cultural politics.

The stream organizers are in search of a collection of original conference papers that, together, will provide a multiperspectival overview, guide to and consideration of Baudrillard's contentious and often misunderstood work on present day cultural politics.

Papers are sought on Baudrillard's writings that discuss and evaluate them in relation to his cultural politics, inclusive of papers on but not restricted to: fatal strategies and the aleatory; seduction; the self; reversibility; celebrity; symbolic exchange and death; simulations; silent majorities; technology; ecstasy; communication; evil; images; America; art; terrorism; media; consumption; feminism; theory-fiction; and postmodernity.

Our aim is to engage with Baudrillard's cultural politics in surprising, exciting and yet accessible ways.

The stream will not only be a point of reference for understanding and assessing Baudrillard's stunning cultural theory and political vision but also the launch pad for a special issue of the international refereed journal, Cultural Politics, to be edited by Douglas Kellner: http://www.bergpublishers.com/uk/culture/culture_about.htm

Please send 250 word abstracts to: Dr John Armitage Co-editor, Cultural Politics Media & Communication Room 306, Lipman Building School of Arts & Social Sciences Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK (t) (+44) 0191 227 4971 (e)(w) j.armitage@unn.ac.uk <mailto:j.armitage@unn.ac.uk> (e)(h) j.armitage@technologica.demon.co.uk <mailto:j.armitage@technologica.demon.co.uk> Visit the Cultural Politics Website And Dr Ryan Bishop Co-Editor, Cultural Politics Associate Professor of English The National University of Singapore Dept. of English AS5, Arts Link Singapore 117570 Tel. 65-6874-6633 Fax: 65-6773-2981 E-mail: ellrb@nus.edu.sg <mailto:ellrb@nus.edu.sg>

Riding around Denver

The ACSM meeting has been a lot of fun and there were a few more familiar faces than I had expected. I had a bit of a break for the final day and took a bike around the west of Denver, into Empire and around the beautiful Rocky Mountain Park, which was amazing.

Is there a human right to be superhuman?

This article was written by Brian Alexander who asked me for some comments about the paper I gave at Stanford University last week. It begins as follows:

Is there a human right to be superhuman?

By Brian Alexander

MSNBC

 

Updated: 7:45 p.m. ET May 31, 2006

getCSS("3027626")

 
 

While America was rushing to see sharp metal blades jut from Wolverine’s fists during the opening of the third "X-Men" movie last weekend, an academic conference was being held at Stanford University to discuss what might happen if people with special powers really existed.